Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.4/8.7.4-MZ) with ESMTP id KAA04802 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 10:32:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA159081044; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 07:30:44 -0800
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 07:30:44 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <memo.573092@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: dbarnard@cix.compulink.co.uk (Dave Barnard)
To: lightwave@e55.webcom.com
Subject: Re[2]: UPDATE Starting your own Business
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
In-Reply-To: <313532FF.58E@airmail.net>
> No, none of the above. We shoot in Betacam SP and you can,t master 2hrs
> and 20 min to a Betacam tape because the largest made is 90 mins. So,
> each edit master will have to be 1 hr and 10 mins. When the tapes go to
> duplication they will have to run each master to a vhs by itself thus
> producing a 2 tape series. You can,t stop in the middle of the
> dupication process, pause 500 tape decks, insert part two, and continue.
> At that point it becomes editing, not duplication. Your lesson in video
> is over for now.
>
> Tom Rennen
> Intelligent light Digital Imaging
>
Well Tom, what you do is edit on Beta each part of the programme,
and edit both parts together to a 1" machine with large-size reels
for your duplication master.
You wouldn't want to be using your precious originals for duping
now would you? All sizable duplicators will have this type
of 1" machine, it is commonly used for features.
This will cost 3 hours of editing time and the 1" stock, but will
save much more in duping - maybe $45 cost would then be possible?